Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology

IEP Quality Tutorial

Add to Comparison
2nd Grade, 3rd Grade, 4th Grade, 5th Grade, 6th Grade, 7th Grade, 8th Grade

About the Intervention

The IEP Quality Tutorial is a web-based decision-making support system designed to help IEP teams develop high-quality, standards-based Individualized Education Programs for students with disabilities in grades 2-8. The Tutorial provides evidence-based tools and resources including Help Topics with guidance and examples, Toolbox Resources with downloadable planning sheets, Goal Assistants to help prioritize state learning standards and write measurable annual goals and short-term objectives, Case Student Scenarios, and a Resource Library. Teachers receive initial 3-hour on-site training on using the Tutorial, along with a training manual and ongoing email/phone support. The Tutorial emphasizes data-driven decisions, prioritization of instructional choices within a standards-based environment, and individualization of IEPs to meet students' unique needs.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on IEP quality for annual goals

Positive effect on IEP quality for short-term objectives

Positive effect on student reading achievement gains

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Those with Disabilities

Programs & Services

Special Education Services

Delivery Methods

Online – Asynchronous

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Teachers/Instructional Teams

Source

Chad A., R., James G., S., John S., T., Karrie A., S., Myungjin, K. & Susan J., C. (2013). Effects of Using a Web-Based Individualized Education Program Decision Making Tutorial (ED576636). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED576636.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?