Highly and Minimally Guided Discovery Instruction for Basic Add-1 and Doubles Combinations
About the Intervention
This study evaluated computer-based interventions designed to promote fluency with basic addition combinations (add-1 and doubles) among kindergarten through second-grade students. The interventions used either highly guided discovery learning (which sequentially arranged problems to highlight patterns and provided explanatory feedback) or minimally guided practice (semi-random practice with feedback on correctness only). The highly guided add-1 training connected adding 1 to number-after relations, while the highly guided doubles training connected doubles to everyday analogies and even numbers. Students participated in two 30-minute computer sessions per week over approximately 9 months. The interventions included preparatory training (7 sessions on concrete counting strategies and 8 sessions on estimation) followed by three stages of primary training focused on strategy discovery, practice, and fluency development. All training was delivered one-on-one at computer stations outside classrooms.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on practiced add-1 combinations for both highly guided and minimally guided groups
Positive effect on unpracticed add-1 combinations for both highly guided and minimally guided groups
Positive effect on practiced doubles for both highly guided and minimally guided groups
Positive effect on unpracticed doubles for highly guided group only
No effect on unpracticed doubles for minimally guided group
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
Economically DisadvantagedPrograms & Services
General EducationDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s)Source
Arthur J., B., David J., P., Erin E., R. & Michael D., E. (2015). The Impact of Highly and Minimally Guided Discovery Instruction on Promoting the Learning of Reasoning Strategies for Basic Add-1 and Doubles Combinations (ED577294). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577294.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?