Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

Educational Software Products Study

Add to Comparison
1st Grade, 4th Grade, 6th Grade, 8th Grade, 9th Grade, 10th Grade, 11th Grade, 12th Grade

About the Intervention

This study evaluated 10 educational software products across reading and mathematics in grades 1, 4, 6, and Algebra I. Products included Destination Reading, Headsprout Early Reading, PLATO Focus, and Waterford Early Reading Program for first grade reading; Academy of Reading and LeapTrack for fourth grade reading; PLATO Achieve Now and Larson Pre-Algebra for sixth grade math; and Cognitive Tutor Algebra I and Larson Algebra I for high school algebra. Most products supplemented core curriculum, though PLATO Focus and Cognitive Tutor served as core curriculum. Products were implemented in diverse, predominantly low-income school districts through random assignment of volunteer teachers to treatment (using products) or control (not using products) groups. Implementation varied by product but generally involved teacher training (ranging from 2 hours to 6 days), ongoing vendor support via phone/email, and student usage in computer labs or classrooms. Recommended usage ranged from 15-45 minutes per session, 2-5 days per week. The study collected fall and spring standardized test scores over two school years (2004-2005 and 2005-2006) to measure product effectiveness.

Statistical Findings

No effect on first grade reading scores for Destination Reading

No effect on first grade reading scores for Headsprout

No effect on first grade reading scores for PLATO Focus

No effect on first grade reading scores for Waterford

No effect on fourth grade reading scores for Academy of Reading

Positive effect on fourth grade reading scores for LeapTrack

No effect on sixth grade math scores for PLATO Achieve Now

No effect on sixth grade math scores for Larson Pre-Algebra

No effect on Algebra I scores for Cognitive Tutor

No effect on Algebra I scores for Larson Algebra I

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Economically Disadvantaged

Programs & Services

General Education, Title I

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Student(s), Teachers/Instructional Teams

Source

Kristina, R., Larissa, C., Mark, D. & Roberto, A. (2009). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings From Two Student Cohorts. NCEE 2009-4041 (ED504657). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504657.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?