Quality Talk
About the Intervention
Quality Talk is a small-group discussion intervention designed to promote high-level comprehension of text for fourth- and fifth-grade students. The intervention uses small groups of 4-6 students who engage in text-based discussions about their regular language arts curriculum readings. Students receive explicit mini-lessons on questioning (6 lessons) and argumentation (4 lessons) to learn how to ask authentic questions and construct reasoned arguments. Teachers participate in initial two-day professional development and receive ongoing coaching through five discourse coaching sessions. The intervention is implemented weekly over a full school year (approximately 19 discussions after baseline), with each discussion lasting 15-20 minutes. Students use Quality Talk literacy journals before and after discussions to prepare questions and respond to prompts. The intervention emphasizes shared control between teachers and students, with teachers gradually releasing responsibility and interpretive authority to students over time. Discussion ground rules establish norms for productive discourse, and each session ends with a debrief where students set content and process goals.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on basic comprehension
Positive effect on high-level comprehension
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
N/APrograms & Services
General EducationDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s), Teachers/Instructional TeamsSource
Carla M., F., Jeffrey A., G., Liwei, W., Mengyi, L., Nikki G., L., P. Karen, M., Rachel M. V., C. & Rebekah F., D. (2017). Exploring the Influence of Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous Grouping on Students' Text-Based Discussions and Comprehension (ED590416). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590416.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?