Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology

Quality Talk

Add to Comparison
4th Grade, 5th Grade

About the Intervention

Quality Talk is a small-group discussion intervention designed to promote high-level comprehension of text for fourth- and fifth-grade students. The intervention uses small groups of 4-6 students who engage in text-based discussions about their regular language arts curriculum readings. Students receive explicit mini-lessons on questioning (6 lessons) and argumentation (4 lessons) to learn how to ask authentic questions and construct reasoned arguments. Teachers participate in initial two-day professional development and receive ongoing coaching through five discourse coaching sessions. The intervention is implemented weekly over a full school year (approximately 19 discussions after baseline), with each discussion lasting 15-20 minutes. Students use Quality Talk literacy journals before and after discussions to prepare questions and respond to prompts. The intervention emphasizes shared control between teachers and students, with teachers gradually releasing responsibility and interpretive authority to students over time. Discussion ground rules establish norms for productive discourse, and each session ends with a debrief where students set content and process goals.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on basic comprehension

Positive effect on high-level comprehension

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

N/A

Programs & Services

General Education

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Student(s), Teachers/Instructional Teams

Source

Carla M., F., Jeffrey A., G., Liwei, W., Mengyi, L., Nikki G., L., P. Karen, M., Rachel M. V., C. & Rebekah F., D. (2017). Exploring the Influence of Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous Grouping on Students' Text-Based Discussions and Comprehension (ED590416). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590416.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?