Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

Professional Development Program: Improving Teachers' Knowledge and Instruction in Rational Numbers to Address Low Student Achievement in Mathematics

Add to Comparison

About the Intervention

The Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study is a program that aims to address the problem of low student achievement in topics in rational numbers. The program consists of a 3-day summer institute and five 1-day seminars held during the school year, as well as 10 days of intensive in-school coaching. The program is designed to develop teachers' capability to teach positive rational number topics effectively, with a focus on common knowledge of mathematics and specialized knowledge of mathematics for teaching. The program is delivered by two providers, America's Choice and Pearson Achievement Solutions, and includes a total of 68 hours of professional development per teacher.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on the frequency with which teachers engaged in activities that elicited student thinking

No effect on teacher knowledge

No effect on student achievement in rational numbers

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Economically Disadvantaged

Programs & Services

General Education

Delivery Methods

Hybrid

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Teachers/Instructional Teams

Source

Andrew J., W., Fran, S., Fred, D., James, T., Kirk, W., Mengli, S., Michael S., G., Pei, Z., Seth, B., Steven, H. & Susan, S. (2010). Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings After the First Year of Implementation. NCEE 2010-4009 (ED509306). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509306.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?