Teacher Advancement Program (TAP)
About the Intervention
The Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) is a schoolwide reform program designed to improve schools by raising teacher quality. Under the TAP model, teachers can earn extra pay and responsibilities through promotion to mentor or master teacher positions, as well as annual performance bonuses based on a combination of their value added to student achievement and observed classroom performance. The program targets K-8 elementary schools and includes weekly meetings of teachers and mentors (cluster groups) and regular classroom observations by a school leadership team to help teachers meet their performance goals. Chicago TAP specifically includes performance pay for principals and other school staff in addition to teachers. Teachers receive performance bonuses (averaging $1,100 in year one and $2,653 in year two), mentor teachers receive $7,000 per year, and lead teachers receive $15,000 as salary augmentation. The program is implemented through face-to-face delivery with professional development and training required for staff before implementation.
Statistical Findings
No effect on reading test scores
No effect on math test scores
No effect on teacher retention in school
No effect on teacher retention in district
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
Economically DisadvantagedPrograms & Services
General Education, Teacher Professional Development / MentoringDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s), Teachers/Instructional Teams, Schoolwide PolicySource
Allison, S. & Steven, G. (2010). An Evaluation of the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) in Chicago: Year Two Impact Report (ED510712). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510712.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?