Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology

Teacher Advancement Program (TAP)

Add to Comparison
Kindergarten, 1st Grade, 2nd Grade, 3rd Grade, 4th Grade, 5th Grade, 6th Grade, 7th Grade, 8th Grade

About the Intervention

The Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) is a schoolwide reform program designed to improve schools by raising teacher quality. Under the TAP model, teachers can earn extra pay and responsibilities through promotion to mentor or master teacher positions, as well as annual performance bonuses based on a combination of their value added to student achievement and observed classroom performance. The program targets K-8 elementary schools and includes weekly meetings of teachers and mentors (cluster groups) and regular classroom observations by a school leadership team to help teachers meet their performance goals. Chicago TAP specifically includes performance pay for principals and other school staff in addition to teachers. Teachers receive performance bonuses (averaging $1,100 in year one and $2,653 in year two), mentor teachers receive $7,000 per year, and lead teachers receive $15,000 as salary augmentation. The program is implemented through face-to-face delivery with professional development and training required for staff before implementation.

Statistical Findings

No effect on reading test scores

No effect on math test scores

No effect on teacher retention in school

No effect on teacher retention in district

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Economically Disadvantaged

Programs & Services

General Education, Teacher Professional Development / Mentoring

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Student(s), Teachers/Instructional Teams, Schoolwide Policy

Source

Allison, S. & Steven, G. (2010). An Evaluation of the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) in Chicago: Year Two Impact Report (ED510712). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510712.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?