Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology

Four Reading Interventions: Corrective Reading, Failure Free Reading, Spell Read P.A.T., and Wilson Reading

Add to Comparison
3rd Grade, 5th Grade

About the Intervention

This study evaluates four widely used remedial reading programs for struggling readers in grades 3 and 5: Corrective Reading, Failure Free Reading, Spell Read P.A.T., and Wilson Reading. The interventions were delivered as pull-out programs in small groups of three students, meeting five days per week for approximately 50-minute sessions from November 2003 through May 2004, totaling about 90 hours of instruction on average. Three interventions (Corrective Reading, Spell Read P.A.T., and Wilson Reading) focus primarily on word-level skills including phonemic awareness, phonemic decoding, and reading fluency through systematic and explicit instruction. Failure Free Reading focuses on building sight vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension through computer-based lessons, workbook exercises, and teacher-led instruction. Teachers were recruited from participating schools and received approximately 70 hours of professional development and support during the implementation year, including 30 hours of initial intensive training, 24 hours during a practice period, and 14 hours of supervision during the intervention phase.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on Word Attack scores for third graders

Positive effect on Phonemic Decoding Efficiency for third graders

Positive effect on Word Identification for third graders

Positive effect on Sight Word Efficiency for third graders

Positive effect on Aimsweb oral reading fluency for third graders

Positive effect on GRADE reading comprehension for third graders

Positive effect on Word Attack scores for fifth graders

Positive effect on Sight Word Efficiency for fifth graders

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

N/A

Programs & Services

General Education, Special Education Services, Title I

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

Specific learning disability

Target Groups

Student(s)

Source

Allen, S., Cinthia, H., David, M., Donna, D., Elizabeth, S., Fran, S., Joseph, T., Rosanne, J., Sonya, V. & Wendy, M. (2006). National Assessment of Title I: Interim Report. Volume II: Closing the Reading Gap: First Year Findings from a Randomized Trial of Four Reading Interventions for Striving Readers. NCEE 2006-4002 (ED491144). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491144.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?