Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology

12 for Life: Providing a rigorous STEM curriculum, combined with on-the-job-training, work/life skills development, mentoring, and employment opportunities to high school students who are at high risk of dropping out of school.

Add to Comparison

Intervention Details

Subject

Science & STEM

Academic Programs

Alternative Education, Career and Technical Education, General Education

Duration

Up to three years

Grades

9, 10, 11, 12

Personnel

General Education Teacher, Employer

Intervention Summary

12 for Life is a program that targets high school students who are at high risk of dropping out of school. It provides a rigorous STEM curriculum, combined with on-the-job-training, work/life skills development, mentoring, and employment opportunities. The program is designed to accommodate the exceptional needs and individual circumstances of the students, with specific components such as a strengths-based approach, personalized learning, and access to supportive adults and peer networking. The program also includes apprenticeships, a STEM-focused secondary school program, and a student-staffed satellite plant where students work part-time.

Statistical Finding Summary

No effect on grade point average (GPA) at the end of 12th grade

No effect on number of suspensions

No effect on incidence of dropping out of school

Source

Kathleen, D. & Olivia, S. (2018). Impact Evaluation of "12 for Life": Better Lives through Education and Employment (ED584161). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED584161.pdf.

Data Sample by Population

These charts show the characteristics of the student populations studied. When assessing programs, you may want to prioritize interventions that yielded success in a similar demographic environment as your school or district.

The subgroup population data as studied here are not available. That means that while this study may work well for your setting, we cannot say based on the published study and results from our system’s reading of that study what the school/district subgroup characteristics were when evaluated here.