Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

Working Memory Training With and Without Strategy Instruction

Add to Comparison

About the Intervention

Working Memory Training With and Without Strategy Instruction is a verbal working memory training program designed for first-grade students at risk for learning difficulties. The intervention involves one-on-one sessions where students complete four verbal working memory tasks (Counting Figures, Calculation Span, Operation Span, and Puzzles) in 35-minute daily sessions over 10 consecutive school days (totaling 5.8 hours). Two versions exist: one with explicit rehearsal strategy instruction where students are taught to verbally rehearse information aloud repeatedly, and one without strategy instruction where students simply practice the tasks. The training uses adaptive difficulty matched to students' performance and includes points and small prizes for engagement. Research assistants deliver the intervention following scripted protocols.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on trained verbal working memory tasks

Positive effect on untrained verbal working memory task (Listening Recall)

Positive effect on passage listening comprehension

Positive effect on listening retell

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Economically Disadvantaged

Programs & Services

Remedial Education

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Student(s)

Source

Douglas, F. & Peng, P. (2017). A Randomized Control Trial of Working Memory Training with and without Strategy Instruction: Effects on Young Children's Working Memory and Comprehension (EJ1122419). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1122419.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?