Instructional Conversation (IC)
About the Intervention
Instructional Conversation (IC) is a pedagogical intervention that is part of the Center for Research on Excellence and Diversity in Education (CREDE) framework. The IC model uses small group discussions (3-7 students) lasting about 20 minutes with clear instructional goals. Teachers lead through topic control while students regulate their own speaking turns. The intervention integrates five CREDE standards: joint productive activity, language and literacy development, contextualization, teaching complex thinking, and teaching through instructional conversations. Teachers implement IC discussions 1-2 times weekly, averaging 30 minutes per session, across content areas including reading, science, math, social studies, and English language arts. The model is designed for all students, particularly English language learners, and requires teachers to complete a 100-hour professional development program before implementation.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on English language arts for all students
Positive effect on English language arts for English language learners
Positive effect on reading for English language learners
Positive effect on science for English language learners
Positive effect on social studies for English language learners
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
English LearnersPrograms & Services
General Education, English as a Second Language (ESL) ProgramDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s), Teachers/Instructional TeamsSource
Diego, B., Manuel, G. C., Melissa E., W. & Pedro R., P. (2018). Early Evaluation Findings from the Instructional Conversation Study: Culturally Responsive Teaching Outcomes for Diverse Learners in Elementary School (EJ1180090). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1180090.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?