Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) and Social Cognitive Model (SCM) Writing Interventions

Add to Comparison
5th Grade, 6th Grade

About the Intervention

This study compared two self-regulatory writing instruction programs for 5th- and 6th-grade Spanish students with learning disabilities and/or low achievement. One hundred and twenty-one students were randomly assigned to either the Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) intervention, the Social Cognitive Model (SCM) intervention, or standard curriculum instruction. Both interventions taught cognitive and self-regulatory strategies for planning, drafting, and revising compare-contrast essays. The SRSD intervention followed six stages: developing background knowledge, discussing strategy goals, modeling the strategy, memorizing the strategy, collaborative practice, and independent performance. The SCM intervention followed four sequential levels: observation (with mastery and coping models), emulation (peer modeling), self-control (individual practice with supports), and self-regulation (adapted performance without supports). Both programs were delivered in 25 sessions of 50 minutes each, three times per week, to small groups of 6-8 students by trained educational psychologists.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on text structure

Positive effect on text coherence

Positive effect on text quality

Positive effect on productivity

Positive effect on time spent writing

Positive effect on time spent revising

Positive effect on writing self-efficacy (SCM only)

Positive effect on time spent planning (SRSD only)

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Those with Disabilities

Programs & Services

General Education, Special Education Services

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

Specific learning disability

Target Groups

Student(s)

Source

Jesus-Nicasio, G. & Raquel, F. (2006). Effects of Two Types of Self-Regulatory Instruction Programs on Students with Learning Disabilities in Writing Products, Processes, and Self-Efficacy (EJ786211). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ786211.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?