NYC School-Wide Bonus Program
About the Intervention
The NYC School-Wide Bonus Program is a group-based teacher incentive pay program implemented in New York City public schools serving kindergarten through eighth grade. Schools randomly selected into the treatment group were eligible to earn school-level bonuses based primarily on student achievement on state math and reading exams. Schools that achieved target scores or received an 'A' accountability grade for two consecutive years received bonuses of $3,000 per union teacher, while schools meeting 75% of the target score received $1,500 per union teacher. The program required 55% of a school's United Federation of Teachers staff to vote in favor of participation. Each participating school formed a four-member compensation committee to determine bonus distribution schemes after exams. The program was implemented in the 2007-2008 school year and continued in 2008-2009, with 181 schools originally selected for the treatment group (128 assigned to treatment, 53 to control) from high-poverty schools.
Statistical Findings
No effect on math scores
No effect on reading scores
No effect on percentage proficient in reading
Negative effect on percentage proficient in math
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
Economically DisadvantagedPrograms & Services
General EducationDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Teachers/Instructional Teams, Schoolwide PolicySource
Goodman, S. & Turner, L. (2010). Teacher Incentive Pay and Educational Outcomes: Evidence from the NYC Bonus Program. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Papers Series. PEPG 10-07 (ED513540). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED513540.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?