Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs
About the Intervention
Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs is a combined intervention designed to help English language learners in grades 2-5 develop reading comprehension ability and English language proficiency. Instructional Conversations are small-group discussions (approximately 45 minutes per week) where teachers act as facilitators, engaging students in discussions about stories, key concepts, and related personal experiences. Literature Logs require students to write independently in response to prompts or questions related to story sections, then share their responses in small groups or with a partner. The intervention was used in two ways across the studies: as a short-term intervention delivered over four days on alternating days with the same story, or as key components of a broader language arts program delivered from grades 2-5. Teachers involved in the studies were members of research and development teams and met bi-monthly to study instructional components, view demonstrations, plan units, and evaluate student work.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on reading achievement
Positive effect on English language development
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
English LearnersPrograms & Services
English as a Second Language (ESL) ProgramDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s)Source
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2006). Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/intervention/245.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?