Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

Science Teachers Learning through Lesson Analysis (STeLLA®)

Add to Comparison
4th Grade, 5th Grade

About the Intervention

STeLLA® is a yearlong professional development program for K-12 teachers that aims to improve students' science achievement by enhancing teachers' science content knowledge and instructional abilities. The program begins with a 2-week summer institute (60 hours) led by postsecondary science faculty and STeLLA® professional development leaders, where teachers develop content knowledge in two science topics, review STeLLA® model lesson plans, learn instructional strategies, and analyze videos of experienced teachers. During the school year, teachers attend eight monthly grade-level study group meetings (30 hours total, 3-4 hours each) where they videorecord their own lessons and collaboratively analyze one another's instruction with guidance from STeLLA® professional development leaders. Teachers receive STeLLA® lesson plans, strategy guides, lesson analysis protocols, videorecordings, transcripts, and online access to their study group's videos.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on science achievement

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

N/A

Programs & Services

Teacher Professional Development / Mentoring

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face, Hybrid

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Teachers/Instructional Teams

Source

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2021). Science Teachers Learning from Lesson Analysis (STeLLA). Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/intervention/1373.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?