NISL Executive Development Program
About the Intervention
The NISL Executive Development Program is a professional development intervention designed for school principals to enhance their leadership capabilities in improving student achievement. The program targets elementary, middle, and elementary-middle school principals and consists of four courses: World-Class Schooling (Principal as a Strategic Thinker and School Designer, Standards-Based Instruction); Teaching and Learning; Developing Capacity and Commitment; and Driving for Results. The curriculum was designed by experts across multiple fields, reflecting an $11 million investment and five years of research and piloting. Training is delivered through a blended format combining online and face-to-face instruction, using simulations, case studies, school evaluations, self-assessments, pre-work assignments, and application activities. Principals who participated in Cohort 2 began the program in 2007 and completed it while remaining at the same school through 2010. The program costs approximately $4,000 per participating principal.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on math scores
Positive effect on English Language Arts scores
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
N/APrograms & Services
Teacher Professional Development / MentoringDelivery Methods
HybridDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Teachers/Instructional Teams, Schoolwide PolicySource
Elizabeth, H., John A., N., Shana, P., Shanan, C. & Steven M., R. (2011). The Impact of the NISL Executive Development Program on School Performance in Massachusetts: Cohort 2 Results (ED531042). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531042.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?