TAP System (The System for Teacher and Student Advancement)
About the Intervention
TAP: The System for Teacher and Student Advancement is a comprehensive educator effectiveness model designed to improve teacher quality and student achievement. The intervention targets teachers and school administrators in K-8 schools, primarily high-need schools with high percentages of economically disadvantaged students. TAP includes four core elements: (1) multiple career paths where skilled teachers serve as master and mentor teachers, providing leadership and support; (2) ongoing applied professional growth through weekly cluster group meetings led by master and mentor teachers; (3) instructionally focused accountability with multiple classroom observations per year by trained evaluators using research-based rubrics; and (4) performance-based compensation where teachers earn bonuses based on classroom observation scores, student achievement growth, and schoolwide growth. Teachers are observed 3-4 times per year by multiple certified raters (principals, master teachers, mentor teachers) using 19 indicators of instructional practice. Master and mentor teachers receive training and certification to conduct evaluations and lead professional development.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect: on K-8 Assessment Index scores
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
Economically DisadvantagedPrograms & Services
Teacher Professional Development / MentoringDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Teachers/Instructional Teams, Schoolwide PolicyCitation
Barnett, J. H., Kirby, P. C. & Wills, K. C. (2014). Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness Models That Work: Impact of the TAP System on Student Achievement in Louisiana (ED556325). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556325.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?