Math Curriculum Comparison Study
About the Intervention
This study compared four elementary math curricula—Investigations in Number, Data, and Space; Math Expressions; Saxon Math; and Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Mathematics (SFAW)/enVision Math—for students in 1st and 2nd grades. Schools were randomly assigned to use one of the four curricula. Each curriculum was implemented as the core math program in participating schools, with teachers receiving training from publishers before the school year began. The curricula differ in their approaches to mathematical emphasis, instructional approach, and supports for teachers. Implementation involved daily math instruction delivered by classroom teachers using the assigned curriculum materials, including textbooks, workbooks, manipulatives, and other resources specific to each program.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on math achievement for Math Expressions compared to Investigations
Positive effect on math achievement for Saxon compared to Investigations
Positive effect on math achievement for SFAW/enVision compared to Investigations
No effect on math achievement between Math Expressions, Saxon, and SFAW/enVision
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
N/APrograms & Services
General EducationDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s), Teachers/Instructional TeamsSource
Barbara, H., Janine, R., Melissa, T., Neil, S. & Roberto, A. (2013). After Two Years, Three Elementary Math Curricula Outperform a Fourth. NCEE Evaluation Brief. NCEE 2013-4019 (ED544185). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544185.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?