Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) and Social Cognitive Model (SCM) interventions

Add to Comparison
Fifth Grade, Sixth Grade

About the Intervention

Two types of self-regulatory instruction programs, the Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) model and the Social Cognitive Model (SCM), were used to address writing difficulties in students with learning disabilities (LD). The SRSD model involves six stages: developing and activating background knowledge, discussing strategy goals and significance, modeling the strategy, memorizing the strategy, collaboratively practicing the strategy, and independently performing the strategy. The SCM model involves four sequential levels: observation, emulation, self-control, and self-regulation. Both programs aim to improve writing skills by teaching cognitive and self-regulatory strategies.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on text-based measures of written products (productivity, coherence, and structure)

Positive effect on reader-based measures of written products (structure, coherence, and quality)

Positive effect on writing self-efficacy

Positive effect on time spent on writing task

Positive effect on planning activities

Positive effect on revising activities

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Those with Disabilities

Programs & Services

Special Education Services

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

Specific learning disability

Target Groups

Student(s)

Source

Jesus-Nicasio, G. & Raquel, F. (2006). Effects of Two Types of Self-Regulatory Instruction Programs on Students with Learning Disabilities in Writing Products, Processes, and Self-Efficacy (EJ786211). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ786211.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?