Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology

Too Good for Drugs: Teaching Goal Setting and Decisionmaking Skills, Prosocial Skills, Resistance to Negative Peer Influence Skills, and Interpersonal Skills to Prevent Drug Use Among Students

Add to Comparison

Intervention Details

Subject

Non-Academic Area

Academic Program

General Education

Duration

10 lessons, 30-45 minutes per lesson

Grades

3, 4, 6

Personnel

General Education Teacher

Intervention Summary

Too Good for Drugs is a program intended to target student behavior and knowledge, attitudes, and values related to substance use. The program consists of 10 lessons at each grade level lasting 30-45 minutes per lesson, and includes information about the frequency of drug use among American youth and the harmful effects of drug use. Instructional strategies cover goal setting and decision-making skills, prosocial skills, resistance to negative peer influence skills, and interpersonal skills. Core values such as respect for self and others, empathic responding, and responsibility are integrated into the lessons. Cooperative learning activities, role-play, and skill-building methods reinforce positive behaviors and skills and encourage students to apply these behaviors and skills in other contexts.

Statistical Finding Summary

Positive effect on behavior

No effect on knowledge, attitudes, and values

Source

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2006). Too Good for Drugs (TGFD). Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/intervention/251.

Data Sample by Population

These charts show the characteristics of the student populations studied. When assessing programs, you may want to prioritize interventions that yielded success in a similar demographic environment as your school or district.

The subgroup population data as studied here are not available. That means that while this study may work well for your setting, we cannot say based on the published study and results from our system’s reading of that study what the school/district subgroup characteristics were when evaluated here.