Waterford Early Reading Program
About the Intervention
Waterford Early Reading Program (WERP) is a technology-based reading program designed to teach children to read, write, and keyboard in early elementary grades, specifically kindergarten. The program uses computer software integrated into learning activities and is research-based. WERP addresses emergent reading skills including Initial Sound Fluency, Letter Naming Fluency, Word Use Fluency, Phoneme Segmentation Fluency, and Nonsense Word Fluency. The program was implemented in 15 Title I elementary schools in the Tucson Unified School District during the 2005-06 school year, targeting kindergarten students with high rates of free/reduced lunch eligibility. Students used the WERP software for varying amounts of time, with the study focusing on students who had at least 1100 minutes (approximately 6 months) of usage. The program includes multiple levels (Reading Level 1, Reading Level 2, and Phonological Awareness components) that students progress through based on their individual needs and abilities.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on Initial Sounds Fluency
Positive effect on Letter Naming Fluency
Positive effect on Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
Positive effect on Nonsense Word Fluency
Positive effect on Total Reading Score
Positive effect on CCSA Reading Assessment
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
Economically DisadvantagedPrograms & Services
Title IDelivery Methods
Blended LearningDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s)Source
Connie, P. & Stephen, P. (2006). Evaluation of the Waterford Early Reading Program in Kindergarten, 2005-06 (ED501576). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501576.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?