Enhanced Academic Instruction in After-School Programs
About the Intervention
This evaluation tests two enhanced after-school programs: Harcourt Mathletics for math and Success for All's Adventure Island for reading. Both programs provide 45 minutes of daily structured academic instruction to students in grades 2-5 who need extra academic support. Mathletics uses differentiated instruction with pretests, skill packs, games, and computer activities, allowing students to progress at their own pace. Adventure Island uses structured daily lessons with fast-paced activities covering phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension, grouping students by reading level. Both programs are delivered by certified teachers in small groups of approximately 10 students, four days per week throughout the school year. Teachers receive upfront training, ongoing technical assistance, and daily paid preparation time. The programs include attendance monitoring, parent follow-up for absences, and incentives to encourage regular attendance.
Statistical Findings
Positive effect on math total scores
Positive effect on math problem-solving
Positive effect on math procedures
No effect on reading total scores
No effect on reading vocabulary
No effect on reading comprehension
No effect on reading word study skills
Positive effect on DIBELS nonsense word fluency
More Intervention Details
Focus Areas
Economically DisadvantagedPrograms & Services
General Education, Targeted Intervention ProgramDelivery Methods
Face-to-FaceDisability Support
N/ATarget Groups
Student(s)Source
Alison Rebeck, B., Fred, D., Jean Baldwin, G., Pei, Z. & Rebecca, U. (2008). The Evaluation of Enhanced Academic Instruction in After-School Programs: Findings After the First Year of Implementation. NCEE 2008-4021 (ED501655). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501655.pdf.
Study Demographics
These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.
Participant Race
What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?
Participant Gender
What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?
Other Participant Characteristics
Geographical Setting
What was the setting of this study?