Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

Teacher Advancement Program (TAP): Improving Teacher Quality to Raise Student Achievement

Add to Comparison
4th Grade, 5th Grade, 6th Grade, 7th Grade, 8th Grade

About the Intervention

Chicago TAP is a schoolwide reform model that links teacher performance measures to pay and aligns mentoring and professional development with the performance measures so that teachers have the resources to improve their practice. Chicago TAP provides teachers with opportunities for professional growth through weekly cluster meetings, mentoring, and leadership roles. Teachers can earn extra pay and take on increased responsibilities through promotion (to mentor teacher or master teacher), and they become eligible for annual performance bonuses based on a combination of their contribution to student achievement (known as "value added") and observed performance in the classroom.

Statistical Findings

No effect on reading scores

No effect on math scores

No effect on science scores

Positive effect on teacher retention rates in the first two years of program rollout

Positive effect on teacher retention rates for teachers with less experience

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

Economically Disadvantaged

Programs & Services

General Education

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Teachers/Instructional Teams

Source

Glazerman, S. & Seifullah, A. (2012). An Evaluation of the Chicago Teacher Advancement Program (Chicago TAP) after Four Years. Final Report (ED530098). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530098.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?