Skip to main content
Implement for Impact
Search Find
Explore Methodology Comparison

ROOTS

Add to Comparison
Kindergarten

About the Intervention

ROOTS is a 50-lesson Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention curriculum designed to support students' conceptual understanding of and procedural fluency with critical whole number concepts. The intervention targets kindergarten students at risk for mathematics difficulties and is fully aligned to the kindergarten Common Core State Standards in the area of number and operations. ROOTS is delivered in 20-minute small group sessions (two or five students) 5 days per week for approximately 10 weeks. The instruction emphasizes concepts from the Counting & Cardinality and Operations & Algebraic Thinking domains and employs explicit and systematic mathematics instruction principles, including explicit teacher modeling, deliberate practice, visual representations of mathematics, and academic feedback. All interventionists participated in two 5-hour professional development workshops and received between two and four coaching visits during implementation.

Statistical Findings

Positive effect on ASPENS

Positive effect on TEMA standard scores

Positive effect on RAENS

More Intervention Details

Focus Areas

N/A

Programs & Services

General Education, Targeted Intervention Program

Delivery Methods

Face-to-Face

Disability Support

N/A

Target Groups

Student(s)

Source

Ben, C., Christian T., D., Derek, K., Evangeline, K. N., Hank, F., Jessica, T. & Keith, S. (2017). Testing the Efficacy of a Kindergarten Mathematics Intervention by Small Group Size (EJ1194151). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1194151.pdf.

Study Demographics

These charts show the demographic makeup and geographic setting of the research study that evaluated this intervention's efficacy. When assessing the fit of an intervention, consider whether it was found effective in a context similar to your own.

Participant Race

What was the racial breakdown of this study's data sample?

Participant Gender

What was the gender breakdown of this study's data sample?

Other Participant Characteristics

Geographical Setting

What was the setting of this study?